If you read my blog, you know how I feel about,
- Gay Marriage
- The US Constitution
- The Equal Rights Amendment
Here's the part I find baffling, 88% of Americans support an amendment that guarantees gender equality and that amendment has not been passed, so why would the 50% who want to ban same sex marriage think they have a chance to amend the US Constitution?
Okay, one more thing ~ Why is it "an attack on marriage," when gay people want to marry also? Sounds like an endorsement to me. George, just shut up! You are predictable, soulless and have nothing to say that is worth listening to.
About this term, culture wars (to borrow a phrase from Gandhi), there is nothing cultured about it.
Oh Yeah, PS If you want to see something about the sanctity of marriage, you can watch Larry King tonight with MaryKay Letourneau and Vili Fualaau.










It never ceases to amaze me how the right wing paints queer folk as promiscuous then forbids us to be legally committed to each other.
For examples of love, committment and family values, take a look at the gay community in the 1980's. We loved supported and cared for each other while we lost people in the AIDS epidemic and another republican administration denied us.
Bush isn't foolin anyone with this crap - not even his vice president
Posted by: diane | June 05, 2006 at 02:49 PM
It is in my opinion (and I've said this before, many times to many people) that it is the president's OBLIGATION to fairly represent his or her constituents regardless of their sexual orientation. I think this president is failing miserably and he could not care less. And it's also in my opinion that we've impeached presidents for far lesser violations of the office.
He says activist judges leave him no choice. Isn't this sort of discriminatory amendment considered activist as well? However one spins it, it's just plain wrong.
Posted by: bee | June 07, 2006 at 02:55 PM