My Photo

Photo Albums

  • Washington DC Oct 2007
  • 59 and its all gravy!
  • VFA NYC Gala
  • Feminist Cafe ~ July '06

Visitors

Blog powered by TypePad

Copyright 2006

Bookmark and Share

« March 2008 | Main | May 2008 »

April 29, 2008

This is a Deal Breaker

I grew up before the time of Barbies and American Girl dolls and after Ginny and storybook dolls.  Mine were Madam Alexander and Tiny Tears.  When I was five I started saying Mass for them and used white poker chips for their Holy Communion.  When I was seven my dad was very sick and priests came to the house to say Mass and distribute consecrated Eucharist.  Non-consecrated hosts were kept in the house and my parents let me use one or two for my doll congregation.  I fully expected to be a priest when I got older and no one bothered me with the truth ~ that I couldn’t be.  The future (and John XXIII) could change all that anyway.

And so this devout little girl listened to all kinds of sermons with great enthusiasm.  Until one Sunday when there was this odd declaration from the pulpit that parents should not let their children watch Ed Sullivan that night as Elvis (who?) was going to be on.  Who was this man that was so wicked he warranted being admonished by a priest at Sunday Mass?  Could his form of evil come right through the box of wires and light?  WOW.  I wanted to see that.  The point being that even at six or seven, I was clear that I would determine what I would and would not accept as appropriate from the pulpit at a Sunday Service. 

As I got older I got even more hip to what was going on.  Pastors were telling people what movies to not see, TV to watch, who to vote for, what is a sin, who should be in church, GIRLS SHOULD NOT BE PRIESTS.  Bingo - Deal breaker.  So I got more discerning and looked for priests that were more in my definition of what a representative of Jesus would say.  From ages thirteen to twenty-one, I looked.  I changed “celebrants” many times.  Redemptorists, Diocesans, Franciscans; both Black and Brown (orders of priests); I searched for ones that inspired and challenged, taught and interpreted, shared insight and grace.  At twenty-one, it was clear that no one in the pulpit inspired me. 

I did not want to hear any more about judgment, sin, damnation, evil, sexism, racism, homophobia, righteousness.  So I stopped.  I stopped going.  And my seeking continued, progressed, expanded and never stopped.  How could anyone sit in a pew to listen year after year, marry their sweetheart, bring their children, share one’s inner life with a pastor and when convenient, when the world can see in, say that he does not agree with the preaching.

I am genuinely befuddled about this.  I am around many sincere Christians who find their pastors/priests inspiring, informative; their touchstone in a world gone mad.  I know many Jewish people who have gone from temple to temple to find the certain Rabbi that speaks to their soul.  And in the world of Buddhism practitioners know that finding one’s teacher is part of the journey of self-discovery.  His Holiness, the Dalia Lama rings my bell at the deepest core of my being.  I just look at his photo and feel my smile spreading warmth through to my soul. 

I want to ask something I have not heard sincerely asked, what does it say about a member in a congregation who disagrees with the essential teachings of their pastor and 1) remains in the community for twenty years and THEN 2) ditches his pastor when the world gets wind of it.  Is this convenience?  Is this disingenuous?  He wants me to think he is really smart, really insightful, really loyal and I can trust him – but, to me, this is a demonstration of very bad judgment.    How can Senator Obama say, “I had no idea that this man was saying all of these things.”  It sounds like a marriage in which no one communicated honestly for two decades, feigned true care and now dumps the association as it does not serve their purposes. 
    
Isn’t this what we want from people in the military?  To be able to say to their commanding officers, “no, this is not moral.”  Or for kids to say to their peers, “no I won’t jump off the Brooklyn Bridge.”  This is what I expect from myself.  If and when someone speaks about things which I find unjust, no matter how difficult, I have to say NO.  I demonstrate by leaving as soon as it is apparent that it will not / cannot change.  To remain is my approval.  The only question is how long does it take for the facts to be revealed.  Maturity and consciousness is measured by one's ability to size up a situation and match it with the proportionate response. 

And even more important to me is watching how this congregant is peeling off his relationship – like a used wetsuit after years in the surf.  This is not a an artificial layer.  This is not merely a surface shell.  In the context of a twenty year relationship, the leader of the congregation has been invited into one’s mind, one’s heart, one’s soul.  Jessup or Jones make that clear, Graham or Falwell make that clear ~ bad or good. 

I do not believe that Barack Obama sat in his pew not hearing, not responding.  Moreover, I do believe that Barack Obama loved his pastor, his pastor loved him.  I am just disgusted that either and/or both are disavowing one another.   That is a Deal Breaker.

April 23, 2008

A Terrible Day for Women

Get the popcorn and hankies; it was quite a day in the US Senate. 

It began with hearings on Tibet at 11:30 chaired by Barbara Boxer.  As Richard Gere said, it was particularly moving to hear how much the Senators know and care.  Until today, I thought they didn’t really know what was going on and the loss of Tom Lantos would bring them to know nothing collectively.  They talked about the six million Tibetans who are displaced, especially the most esteemed Dalai Lama himself. 

The enormous outbreak of violence that occurred March 10, 2008 had been percolating for 58 years even though the PRC said it was a contemporary uprising fueled by His Holiness.  I can’t imagine that anyone would be so stupid as to blame anything violent on him ~ it is the ultimate disclosure that they are lying.  Lodi Gyari, envoy for HHDL, said that living the life of non-violence is the most difficult way of life.  He explained that a few years ago, visiting the village of his youth, he had to manage his commitment to non-violence every minute, every moment as he watched the terrible violations of human rights. 

Richard Gere said something amazing, that the Tibetans “think of America as a beacon of freedom and it is very important to them.”  As a Buddhist, I want to say that I felt it as a call to be that; to be all that they think we are.  And to think well of others, to believe the best, to call others to be their best.  Their suggested remedies are to open a Consulate in Lhasa, President Bush to visit Tibet after the Olympic opening ceremonies in Beijing, allow press access to Tibet and opening Friendship Bridge which the PRC closed.   

Immediately following the hearings on Tibet, the Senate discussed HR 2831 Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.   Ted Kennedy had a fine fit, emotionally opening the debate, waving papers in his hand, pointing to a easel board showing how this is erasing 40 years of civil rights.  I have to tell you, I could not imagine who could speak against this act or what they would say.
Senators Clinton and Obama spoke.  Senator Schumer explained that the Supreme Court decision was un-American.  Justice Ginsberg called it mean, uncharacteristically reading her dissent from the bench.   She said that the court doesn’t comprehend or is indifferent to the real world circumstances confronting working women.  Fundamentally, Lily Ledbetter (present in the gallery) represents the 12 million women who are paid 77 cents or less for a male-earned dollar.  Women, who need the work as much as men, are not going to threaten their employment by asking their male contemporaries what they earn, complain if it is not equal and file a lawsuit. 

Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-Maryland) invoked Abigail Adams.  She explained that Lily represents 150 million who list pay equity as their number one issue.  Finally she said, “Tell everyone about this ignominious decision as it is a call to arms;
1) Put on your lipstick
2) Square your shoulders
3) Suit up
We’ve got a hell of a fight coming but we are ready, THE REVOLUTION STARTS TONIGHT.” 

April 07, 2008

Sexism - shudda been retired by now (NOW).

What a way to start a Monday morning.  Attachment is a struggle, particularly when it is to something so right.  Today I am speaking on Equal Rights again.  I figured by now it would only be for nostaligia - sort of like rolling out the old one to hear good ole stories.  And yet, Ledbetter Fair Pay is stalled in the Senate (What is Feinstien thinking?). 

If you do only one thing - one thing for the ERA - Call 850 488-1450 to clog the office lines of FL House Speaker Rubio's office for THE NEXT 10 DAYS.  HE is the obstacle to ERA now.  SPEAK to or leave a message for ONLY the Speaker OR Bob Ward his Chief of Staff .  SAY: "I am calling to urge the Speaker to put his power and weight behind calendaring the ERA bill in the House right away." We KNOW that he can. He said for TV that he is for equality as he has 2 daughters. He needs to stand up for them now.

Watch this video, if you dare.  Attachment is mine.  I hope it is yours.